AIP Publishing

My Role

UX Designer

Team

Lead Web Developer

Product Managers

Marketing Director

Timeline

Jun - Aug 2021, 3 months

Tools Used

Figma

Balsamiq

Overview

As part of a company R&D project, I led the redesign of AIP's search website that hosts academic research, articles, and journals in physics.


I played a critical role in identifying user's pain points, scoping the project, and proposing design solutions to stakeholders in technology.

Read my process below

Step 1 of 5 – Project Kickoff

Identifying Current Issues

How are users behaving?

Starting off, I asked myself initial questions – Who are our users? How do they use the website? What frustrations do they run into?


I used Crazy Egg to extract data from 18,000 users on the current landing page. These heatmaps show user interactions, with warmer colors representing higher engagement.

1. Heavy Reliance on Search

Most users only click on the search bar, resulting in other resources not being utilized.

2. Visitor Abandonment

Most users leave once they scroll, suggesting a need to make content easier to understand and use.

Landing Page Heatmaps

The Problem

The Problem

Visitors abandon the website quickly, missing out on valuable resources beyond the search bar.

Project Goals:

Increase Engagement

Redesign access to resources to enhance usability, mitigate drop-off rates, and encourage deeper exploration.

Prioritize Current Users

Maintain the prominence of search functionality while enhancing other resources.

Design Efficiently

Refresh the visual design, improve page organization, and reduce scroll length to help users find information quicker.

Step 2 of 5 – User Research

Understanding User Goals

What are our pain points?

Next, I collaborated with the product and marketing team to create an affinity map, grouping user's pain points into key categories.


This highlighted redesign opportunities and acted as a guide in my design process.

Affinity Map

Who are our users?

My next objective was to better understand who our users are and what goals they have on the homepage.


I translated a role chart from the technology team into two user personas and flow charts to ensure the redesign would address goals of key users.

Anika

"As a physics professor, I want to quickly discover the latest textbooks and articles in physics to enhance my curriculum and support my students' learning."

Motivations

  • Provide high-quality, relevant resources to students to enhance their learning experience.

  • Utilize Scitation's reputable and comprehensive database for accurate and reliable information.

Pain Points

  • Overwhelmed by site's vast amount of content, making it difficult to find relevant textbooks and articles.

  • The site doesn’t look like other modern sites, leading to a frustrating experience.

User Persona 1

Josh

"As a master's student in Applied Physics, I want to find peer-reviewed articles, literature reviews, and research data for my thesis."

Motivations

  • Access to a wide range of peer-reviewed articles to support his thesis research.

  • Utilize advanced search features to efficiently find highly specific research papers.

Pain Points

  • The site's structure is not intuitive, leading to wasted time trying to find certain resources.

  • Lack of search filtering options makes it hard to sift through large volumes of information.

User Persona 2

Step 3 of 5 – A/B Testing

Testing Redesign Ideas

Low-fidelity iterations

Next, I ventured to see what competitors in the industry are doing and how they structure search features, content, and resources.


From my findings, I created two landing page designs that propose different solutions to features and search features and organization above and below the fold.

Show markups

Low-Fidelity Wireframes

Show markups

Low-Fidelity Wireframes

Show markups

Low-Fidelity Wireframes

Stakeholder feedback

I was eager to test my redesign ideas, but I didn't have access to end-users. This meant missing out on insights that could influence my design direction.


Being in a 3-month internship required a quick pivot, so I arranged sessions with Product and Marketing teammates to test my two designs using A/B testing and role-based feedback.

A/B Testing

Stakeholders navigated each design and shared feedback on usability and initial impressions.

Role-Based Feedback

Stakeholders assumed the role of an end-user and evaluated each design based on their needs.

Stakeholder Testing Board

Low-Fidelity Wireframes

Feels more familiar and predictable for users, requiring a lower learning curve.

Design A: Feels more familiar and predictable for users, requiring a lower learning curve.

Looks the same, other resources such as textbooks and articles are hidden in the menu.

Design A: Looks the same, other resources such as textbooks and articles are hidden in the menu.

Stands out as more innovative and engaging, with the ability to support more resources.

Design B: Stands out as more innovative and engaging, with the ability to support more resources.

More disruptive for existing users accustomed to using the website only for search.

Design B: More disruptive for existing users accustomed to using the website only for search.

The Result

The Result

Both versions were strong, but Design B promised to enhance resource discovery, user engagement, and market appeal.

Step 4 of 5 – Visual Design

Putting It All Together

1. Rebranded Design

I translated Design B into a high-fidelity design, focusing on my goal of creating a more engaging and rebranded experience.

High-Fidelity Preview

Search bar relocated to the top with other navigation, allowing for more space above the fold.

Card carousels through resources, providing access and discovery to lesser known products.

2. All-in-One Search

Given the popularity of the search bar, a primary focus was to enhance its functionality.


Previously, 'Advanced Search' and 'Citation Search' were separated across pages, disrupting the journey. I created an all-in-one search bar that brings these filters to the forefront.

Video Loop – Search Bar

Users can fine-tune their search, allowing for more precise, efficient search experiences.

Specific filters allows users to access more resources in the search database.

3. Simplified Information

A key component of the redesign was making information below the fold easier to use, as each Publishing Partner filled up the entire screen.


I researched ways to best present information-heavy content and adopted a card UI approach.

Stack vs Grid

Stacked layout allows space to showcase all resources within each partner.

Grid layout provides users with a visual way to compare different partners.

Step 5 of 5 – The Result

Wrapping Up

Desktop & Mobile Mockup

Presenting the prototype

At the end, I presented my project, research, and high-fidelity prototype to stakeholders in technology.

"My colleagues on the technology team were impressed with Hunter’s ideas and will move them to live production."

Robert Als, Web Development Lead

70% Decreased Length

Restructuring and redesigning information drastically reduced the landing page length compared to the original.

Success Metrics

Met goals of improving functionality, access to resources, and creating an updated experience.

Next Project

Mobile / Lead Product Designer

Mobile / Lead Product Designer

MoneyManager

Simplifying personal finance for young adults by interviewing classmates and prototyping solutions.

© 2024 Hunter Guinn. All Rights Reserved.

Last updated by Hunter on January 10, 2025 at 9:40 PM

© 2024 Hunter Guinn. All Rights Reserved.

Last updated by Hunter on January 10, 2025 at 9:40 PM

© 2024 Hunter Guinn. All Rights Reserved.

Last updated by Hunter on January 10, 2025 at 9:40 PM